On Page 2, LZ Granderson writes about the response to Imus and takes activist groups -- as well as himself -- to task:

If one of the main goals of these groups is to end hate speech, why do they sit on their proverbial hands when hate is being spewed at someone outside of their constituency group? Like a player refusing to double Shaq in the post because that's not his man, by not aggressively denouncing the displays of hate speech targeted at others these groups are inadvertently undermining their own integrity and success.

And trust me, I know of what I speak. One of the things I've always regretted was not writing about Michael Irvin's comments about Tony Romo.

(quick catch award to pilight)